Infant Mortality and Universal Healthcare

In the continued fight between free market healthcare and universal healthcare, the issue of infant mortality is used as a talking point.  The United States has the most advanced medical treatment systems in the world today, but it doesn’t always seem fair that some people have access to the best care and others don’t.  The trade off for our type of system is that we can continually develop the most cutting edge treatments but they will remain unreasonably expensive until they become more common.  The one area we don’t lead the world in is infant mortality, and the supporters of universal healthcare point to this as a major reason we should give up our free market principles.  So what really causes infant mortality, and is it a good enough reason to make the switch?

 The number one cause of infant mortality is congenital defects; meaning some type of deformation of the baby while still in the womb.  There are several factors involved with this problem that need some extra explanation.  First, abortion is not as accepted in this country as it is in many other industrialized countries around the world; so in other countries the mother would be more inclined to abort the baby, making it not count toward the infant mortality rate.  Second; each individual race has a different rate of congenital defects and they are easier handled when everyone has the same problems, but we in the United States are a melting pot of every race and every problem.  Third is prenatal care and this is the only point that has anything to do with our type of healthcare system; because people who have to pay for healthcare are less inclined to go, even if they have insurance.  The trade off in countries with universal healthcare is that everyone goes to the doctor too often because it’s free; this eventually overwhelms the system and forces the government to ration care or go bankrupt. 

Read the rest of this entry »

America’s understanding of healthcare reform needs to move beyond news headlines and 30-second sound-bites toward a deeper understanding, and Wednesday night’s ABC-TV presentation by the president – Prescription for America – did little to further that cause. The president seemed to be over his head talking about the issue, which probably explains why the audience appeared distant, bored and even catatonic.

Most of the audience questions and anecdotes were off-point and not relevant to the big picture and the president’s comments seemed at times to be incoherent and confusing. ABC’s news anchors Charles Gibson and Diane Sawyer did their best to focus and clarify the discussion, but even they were unsuccessful keeping the session on track. It was 60 minutes of regurgitated Obama-ganda and not his best effort.

President Obama asserted that one-third of current healthcare costs are unnecessary, but didn’t elaborate.

Read the rest of this entry »

Senior House Democrats on Friday introduced their plan for reshaping the nation’s health care system, calling for a new government insurance option, a new mandate on employers to provide coverage and a new guarantee of subsidized health care for the poor.

The draft — the fullest presentation so far of congressional liberals’ vision for overhauling medical care — offered few indications of how such a plan would be financed. The price tag is expected to top trillion.

The bill’s authors said they would detail their plan to cover the costs in coming weeks.

Read the rest of this entry »